THE NATIONAL INDIGINOUS VIEW – BY ‘DR DUCK’ (TRIBAL NAME FOR DR DAVID) -
A DISPLACED SHAMAN ‘LAW THERAPY’ HEALER INDIGINEE OF THE DJANGADI DUNGHETTI (KEMPSEY KINCHELA) PEOPLES
AS ALL THE FIRST NATIONS TRIBES PEOPLES ALWAYS WATCHED THE WEATHER AND KNEW HER HISTORY AND ALL OF HER WAYS AND I AM OF THAT TRADITION
“THE WIND BLOWETH WHERE SHE LISTETH” - A ‘CONTRACTUAL CIVIL BET’ IS IN OPERATION IN REGARD TO MY FORENSIC STUDY
CLIMATE CHANGE AND GLOBAL WARMING WE/AUSTRALIA SAYS NO! - THE AUTHORITATIVE INDIGENOUS 150 CHART NATIONAL GLOBAL WARMING TEMPERATURE STUDY
THE AUSTRALIAN EXPERIENCE OVER 150 YEARS FROM THE OFFICIAL NATIONAL PUBLICALLY AVAILABLE
AUSTRALIAN BUREAU OF METEOROLOGY (BOM) OBSERVATION DATA AND DR DUCK’S (DR DAVID’S) CONSEQUENT FORENSIC ANALYSIS CHARTS
*** Please send our website URL link to everyone on your email lists and in your social media groups to discuss ***
Videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25I1TFw9ma0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5W50fLSTTs - Click here for script.
***
Although it is a bit tricky and takes a bit of effort, if you click
on the various state links below you will eventually get through to
both the charts (they are spreadsheets so a bit unusual), and to each
state and each territory’s different site, of over 100 years
activity,’s maxima and minima temperature data.
New South Wales data says:----Decidedly No
Victoria data says:----------------No
Queensland data says:-----------Well, No
South Australia data says:-------Probably Not
Western Australia data says:----No
Tasmanian data says:------------Apparently Not
Northern Territory data says:---No
Australian Capital Territory Decidedly Not
Antartica data says:--------------Unlikely
Macquarie Island says:----------Yes!
Inner Central Australia: Maybe, Maybe Not, But Probaly Not
Some Secluded Very Pristine Spots: Lighthouses, Capes, Promontories, Points, Islands: Maybe, maybe not, but then again, if you look at the minimum of the minimums – that’s always the most important one, the minimum of the minimums – because if global warming is happening, then it’s just got to be happening there
The Capital Cities, Some Heatsinks:
Australia says:------------------- Not Really
*** Bonus: the sunspot 11 year cycle effect over 164 years on Sydney Rainfall: 1858-2022
Sydney Melbourne Brisbane Adelaide Perth Hobart Darwin Canberra Australia
If anyone anywhere would like me to do a free historical: maximums and minimums and a rainfall chart for your town or locality anywhere
in Australia, I can do all three for free and email them all off to you with all the historical source data.
I have done the capital city charts plus a few other towns up on the data charts, up on the left (what do you think of Canberra A.C.T.???!!!, then look at NSW and Victoria)
Simply email or text me at drdavidmurphy@tpg.com.au (mobile: 0419 605 365) and tell me what town you want and as I do them I will start adding them into the above data charts.
Please tell me if you are needing the charts for a legal matter.
*** Click here to listen to a short 3 minute audio
*** Click here to listen my much more detailed 64 minute explanatory address to the Sydney Open Forum on the evening of 3rd June 2020. The convenor, Mr David Duffy, was allegedly murdered in November 2022 for having hosted this recently posted talk to show who we are dealing with and that, admissively, they have lost my April 1st, 2020, Contractual Civil Bet and have been insolvenced, and all moneys and assets implicitly transtitled under the accrual system of accounting.
With reference to all my many charts in this ‘200 Charts, Global Warming is not in Evidence in Australia’ study:
what on earth does it mean to keep global warming below 1.5°C warming by 2040 ??????
All the charts in any other country are going to look very similar to my 200 Australia charts – jumping around madly all over the place, place by place, day by day, week by week, month by month, year by year, up and down, down and up, up and down.
Is the temperature at 12.01 am on January 1st 2040 really going to mean anything, and what date it start from, considering it would have to a measurement taken in the same place, but everywhere else will be different, with just as much validity to theirs. Half will have gone up and half will have gone down.
Consequently, it is impossible to measure and also before long, it will go back under to register a loss of -1.5°C, is it not the case?
This is the real reason why the goal of keeping under 1.5°C by 2040 is impossible to attain, it is because it is impossible to assess and impossible to gauge failure or success, but we can say that within the first few days or weeks or months of 2040, less than the unable to be measured under 1.5°C it will be achieved – many many times.
Sorry to be a party pooper but I won my published April 1st 2020 Winner-Takes-All Contractual Civil Bet on this subject outside Court 5.5 of the Downing Centre by way of a mutual interchange of service of process upon their Sydney Prosecutor on May 30th, 2020, and them upon me.
Before long the Prosecutor jumped ship, a later Barrister announced her resignation from the case, and a second Prosecutor assigned to the case has also now washed her hands of the case and disappeared
It cannot honestly be said that any purported ‘Global Warming’, and hence ‘Climate Change’ is happening in any other country in the world until this same thoroughly comprehensive study is done in as many countries as possible.
In Australia my 200 Charts study proves well beyond reasonable doubt that no alleged global warming, or hence irregular climate change, is taking place in Australia.
Please feel free to get your country’s temperature record study and do this same thoroughly comprehensive maxima and minima temperature study in your own country.
Dr Duck
Tribal Elder,
Voice for the Oppressed,
Law Therapist
Premises and Process
In order to best determine the statistical and chartable veracity of alleged, so called, 'global warming' and 'climate change' as a result of an alleged 'greenhouse effect', for each state and territory of Australia and for Antarctica, one need go no further than the publically available Australian Bureau of Meteorology's maximum and minimum temperature observation readings for some 1,969 observation sites across Australia going back to 1856, to be found at http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/data/index.shtml.
The observation raw data to be found there is the final arbiter on what is happening, temperature-wise, in regard to the global warming debate as it concerns Australia. I look forward to many other researchers in other countries following suit with similar studies of their own Bureaus of Meteorology equivalents' observational temperature histories and pursuing the courses of action I outline below.
The accompanying data and charts to be found at the above links show what I believe to be the best and simplest way this data can be presented, analyzed and interpreted.
For this study only those 211 sites, with over 100 years of temperature observations, were taken into account so as to discover any long term cycles and make relative findings.
Each state has been studied and charted separately to discover its own results. Eight charts are provided for each state, four (1 to 4) relating to the maxima readings and four (5 to 8) for the minimums. I assert for my study the minimums to be the more significant.
The results are presented in spreadsheets with the eight charts each and you are able to see on the left the very formulas that have been used to analyze the data, to the right, to create the charts.
For each chart a standard linear trend line has been generated and on the left of the graphs you are able to see how many degrees Celsius are in play for that graph. Across the bottom are the years the chart covers.
The Charts
The first chart for each state is the annual average of all the maximums of a state's sites and the fifth chart for each state is the annual average of all the minimums of a state's sites. These calculated figures are to be found in the blue column b. A standard linear trend line has been generated by the spreadsheet program.
The second chart for each state shows simultaneous 5, 10, 20 and 50 year moving averages of the maximum temperatures. The sixth graph is the same again but based on the minimum temperature readings for that state. The calculated figures giving rise to the graph are again to be found in columns c, d, e and f to the left. A standard linear trend line has been generated by the spreadsheet program, usually based on the 20 year moving average.
The third chart is the highest of the maximums over the twelve months of each year for each state. The seventh chart is the highest of the minimums over the twelve months for that state for each year. Again a standard linear trend line has been generated to show upward or downward or even flat line trends.
The fourth chart is the minimum maximum over the twelve months across all sites for each year for that state or territory. The eighth chart is the same again: the lowest of all the twelve minimum months across all sites for each year for that site. It is submitted that the eighth chart for each state is the acid test for any global warming as it is the lowest minimum of the minimums for each site in each state over the 100+ years. If there is any global warming being caused by excess carbon dioxide (which is only 0.18% of the atmosphere, 1/600th!, far better to incriminate nitrogen at 78%!) it must show up here in the trend line as the maximum readings tend to be influenced by
- human habitation, such as the continual increase of heat absorbing building materials causing increased ambient heat in 'heat sink' urban centers, which ambient increased heat finds its way into the maximums readings. In former times solar radiation was absorbed by plants as photosynthesis, but as greenery made way for more and more urban construction, there results increased heat as reflected in the maximums readings. On the carbon dioxide note, it has been observed that where there an excess of carbon dioxide, as in a greenhouse, the plants take up the excess and flourish. This is the true 'greenhouse effect', plants proliferating due to the extra carbon dioxide.
- observation sites are increasingly being positioned at airports and the resulting readings are significantly being impacted by both the 'tarmac effect', where a dark tarmac becomes a massive heat sink radiating ambient heat - that is unless the tarmac is white, and the jet exhausts effect where super heated exhausts may well upwardly affect maximum daytime readings. Heat sink airport buildings may also radiantly impact readings.
As said, the acid test for global warming are the eighth charts, the absolute minimums of the minimums for all the sites in a state, as they absolute minimums are not affected by the sun and the trend lines are of especial significance.
An all Australia summary chart is also provided, but please bear in mind that for charts one, two, five and six the results are skewed by the size and weightings of each state or territory, taking into account the area of each state and what its own summary readings contribute to the overall Australia wide summary charts. It is recommended that to get a truer perspective, rather than just referring to the skew affected national charts one, two, five and six, study each individual state's charts, instead, taking into account the number of observation stations for each.
Apart from the states, the NT and the Australian site, Antarctica's results are also presented, even though the three Antarctic sites chosen are not of as great longevity as the Australian sites qualifying. Antarctica is also an acid test for global warming and chart eight, the minimum of the minimums for each year, it is submitted, is the clincher for the contrary argument in relation to global warming. If global warming is happening then it must be clearly evident in the minimums of the minimums across the years for all states and the two territories, (NT and Antarctica).
Macquarie Island data is also analyzed and presented.
As the data for all the 211 sites has been provided, you can pursue your own studies for any particular location, now that you know how to do it. The charts I have created are those covering an entire state or territory or the whole of Australia. You are welcome to create specific charts for any particular town or observation site in any state or territory by creating a chart, or charts, based upon the annual average maximums or annual average minimums to be found in any of the thirteenth, (e.g. AO, BO, CO etc), columns. You can also insert a trendline and do moving averages of any duration. You can even go on to do a particular town’s maximums of maximums, minimums of maximums, maximums of minimums or minimums of minimums, if you like. The supplied super heat sink Sydney charts (NSW, Sheet 2, ADR to AEA columns) are an example of how do to just one site.
If you like you can become a part of what comes next - or do your own.
The Laying Down of a Contractual Civil Bet and the Process of Securing Admission and a Win
(1) The requesting party may, by a notice served on the admitting party ("the requesting party's notice" ), require the admitting party to admit, for the purposes of the proceedings only, the facts specified in the notice.
(2) If, as to any fact specified in the requesting party's notice, the admitting party does not, within 14 days after service on the admitting party of the requesting party's notice, serve on the requesting party a notice disputing that fact, that fact is, for the purposes of the proceedings only, taken to have been admitted by the admitting party in favour of the requesting party only.
(3) The admitting party may, with the leave of the court, withdraw any such admission.
On December 15th, 2015, in the Equity Division of the Supreme Court of New South Wales, I, as a litigant in person and the founding President of the former Sydney Self Litigants Association, had the esteemed honour and privilege of securing the first known precedent for a taken up 'Contractual Civil Bet' (aka a 'contention for cash', a 'dispute for consideration', in the vernacular: “put your money where your mouth is”) in that Justice Lindsay of the Supreme Court, found there to have been a loser in the said civil bet that came before the Court. This loss was reversed ten weeks later (24.2.16) in the then 'contractual civil bet' context, which implicitly, by finding at that stage there to have been a loser, was a finding for the said civil bet's having been in force and hence for the said civil bet's existence and antecedents and elements, and for there being initial winners, eight, who all forfeited their notified wins. (A play has been written on one of these initial wins. I'm after a producer for this historic epic win of an eventual 4 billion dollars and for the bringing to the life the story (“Catherine's Win”) of one lady who foreswore her winnings under oath in the Downing Centre Local Court).
I now level one of these 'contractual civil bets' at all those who, in the face of this compelling evidence, in particular those profiteering opportunistic fraudsters and scammers, who argue from a now unfounded position.
The amount of the 'contractual civil bet' ante (stake) is again $500 million for governmental organizations and $250 million for corporate organizations and $20 million for individuals (lower antes will be considered). If a leveled 'contractual civil bet' is not taken up it will be seen as a concession to the evidence and conclusions. Aspirants to the contractual civil bet must have capacity to 'throw their hat into the ring'. Persistence with such arguments in the public arena after 30th June 2020 will be taken as acceptance of the challenge of this leveled 'contractual civil bet'.
Dr David Gregory Murphy
Researcher
and Law Therapist
Magdalene Technologies and Solutions
Email: lawtherapy@devfinresp.org
Phone (+61) 0419 605 365.
© & IP
Introductory Video: https://youtu.be/kiul4-UwfJ4
Eventually Taken Up Dispute for Consideration Contractual Civil Bet Challenge:
Feature Letter to the Editor
Landmark, Line in the Sand Global Warming / Climate Change / Carbon Credits - Australia Says No! Study
For a long time I had been hearing arguments as to alleged global warming with no real hard evidence from the Australian Bureau of Meteorology temperature observation data. This caused me to wonder why were those championing alarmist, catastrophist global warming assertions not backing up their arguments with the extensive, publically available data?
I became suspicious. Was it that they had checked the data out and found that it did not support their contentions? Surely, if the BOM observation data was supportive those advancing global warming notions, with their incredibly massive budgets, would be trumpeting the data support all over the place.
But instead silence.
I grew more suspicious. Surely those vociferously advocating global warming would have done this rather very basic initial research and been there long long before me and so knew all about it. And that goes for not only Australia but all other countries' respective BOM observation data readings, the world over, as well.
Surely they had checked them all - or had they??? Surely !!!???
Could it be that I was the first person in Australia, or the world even, to see the eighty very telling charts? If the charts supported global warming contentions you would be seeing them up everywhere, on billboards, on TV, in every magazine, textbooks, emails. absolutely everywhere.
But, alas, you never ever have - until now.
Why the deafening silence???
Eight years ago I completed a Sydney rainfall study from BOM data and knew where the temperature data was to be found.
So, starting from no particular preconceived notion except piqued curiosity, as I had not heard anything but a lot of hot air and waffle, and being a data researcher, I decided to do my own unpaid research. It took over eighteen months of analysis to come up with definitive answers in the form of the eighty detailed informative charts, eight for each state, (four maxima and four minima each; the minima are arguably the important ones) and territories and Australia wide summaries, as to whether global warming is actually happening or not, as far as all Australia goes - and if so by how much?, if at all.
You can view my findings at scwl.org/gwasn.html and draw your own conclusions as to whether global warming is a fact or perhaps rather just an imaginative, fictional scam for some well-placed, very clever, about-to-come-unstuck people pulling swifties to make an awful lot of money through selling dubious 'carbon credits' that are of no practical use. I am convinced that those operators at the very top know quite well that it is all a massive scam and are laughing all the way to the bank. Insider promoters and senior bureaucrats on hefty commissions are a;so presumed to know this quite well. Hence my 'laying down of the gauntlet' challenge to all those in on the alleged, now documented scam.
Please make up your own mind.
I have also updated my rainfall study so can see the clear influence of the eleven year solar cycle on Sydney rainfall since 1859.
These findings can be used by you for doing school projects, winning court cases, bets and recovering carbon credit moneys fraudulently exacted to gain benefits by deception.
Maybe your paper will run a spread of some school projects inspired by this study from various schools in your catchment area.
My phone number is on the study if you wish to ring me to discuss the findings and my challenge.
Dr David Murphy, ex teacher, researcher and law therapist.
0419 605 365
Note: All algorithmic formulae used for the construction of my now 200 Chart Study are my intellectual property and not to be used by anyone else in Austrlia without consent by me. +++
Global warming analyst boffins in any other country should contact me by email, or via whatsapp, to discuss your setting out upon doing your own study for your country’s maxima and minima from your country’s temperature records.
You welcome to conduct a contractual civil bet as I have done in your own country if the opportunity arises as they are legal at law. Please feel welcome to contact me to ask me why.
© & IP
Notice to admit facts
(1) The requesting party may, by a notice served on the admitting party ("the requesting party's notice" ), require the admitting party to admit, for the purposes of the proceedings only, the facts specified in the notice.
(2) If, as to any fact specified in the requesting party's notice, the admitting party does not, within 14 days after service on the admitting party of the requesting party's notice, serve on the requesting party a notice disputing that fact, that fact is, for the purposes of the proceedings only, taken to have been admitted by the admitting party in favour of the requesting party only.
(3) The admitting party may, with the leave of the court, withdraw any such admission.
Judgment on admissions
(1) If admissions are made by a party, whether by his or her pleadings or otherwise, the court may, on the application of any other party, give any judgment or make any order to which the other party is entitled on the admissions.
(2) The court may exercise its powers under this rule even if the other questions in the proceedings have not been determined.
DOCUMENTS:
Greta_n2af_admissions_and_elaborations.doc
Hi
Jim, and Sasha
Thanks for the chat yesterday.
The link to my authoritative Global Warming, Australia Says No, 200 Chart Study is gwasn.html
At the website and attached is my taken up Contractual Civil Bet of April 1st, 2020, finally taken on from overseas, by way of service just outside Court 5.5 on level 5 of the Downing Centre Court Complex on April 26th 2021, the first day of Court after Anzac Day, in consequence of my successful section 17.3's electronically served directly on default 'Ambassador' Greta Thunburg's section 17.3's.
I have reproduced below seven paragraphs from paragraphs 94 to 100 in my document served upon the CDPP prosecutor (who has now departed the case) who is instructed in my legal matter by the WEF etc which came about when their ire was aroused from my section 17.3's with Ms Greta Thunberg, entitling me and all of us to a section 17.7 Judgment Upon Admissions. The two section 17 sections are reproduced below so the attendees can know the legal techniques I used, along with the 200 chart study to extricate Australia out of every climate change agreement that we have unscientifically, with cavalier disregard for the impeccible, beyond reproach, Bureau of Meteorology data and charts, been entered into, that attendees can now plead as legal evidence to avoid any improper financial imposts.
The section 17.3's with Greta Thunburg are to be found at the bottom of my gwasn.html webpage.
As you can see I have given twelve very well received, authoratative talks as a researcher with legal capacity, the only one that I know of, on the subject of global warming. I am the only one I know of taking any direct and decisive due process legal action on the issue in which I have obtained an implicit win.
On January 14th the Bureau of Meteorology will start dropping all the readings for December 2022 so I hope to have the study up to date including 2022 on the Global Warming - Australia Says No 200 chart study by early to mid February.
I would be happy to address upon these matters on February 2nd. You are welcome to send this email to all attendees and enquirers interested in the current legal proceedings as regards illicit global warming/climate change impositions being imperiously imposed upon them by councils etc
I am also happy to meet up with those people most interested in these matters of national concern
Dr David Gregory Murphy
Midwest Research SCWL
Analyst and Researcher
Indigenous Law Therapist and Law War Therapist, Law Warrior and War Lienor Healer
Party in the Current Court Proceedings
Litigant in Person, 1999 Founding President of the Sydney Self Litigants Association
First Nations Elder, Capacitate Custodian and Defender Of Our Native Land
Ex Teacher: Once a Teacher, Always a Teacher
Indigenous Capacitate WW3 Lienor Custodian (the only one ever)
Mobile: 0419 605 365
Hello Everyone,
We are having a climate forum on Thursday, February 2nd at the Dee Why RSL. 7 pm to 9.45 pm. $15
It
is close to the B1 bus, which is faster than driving and a frequent
service.
The room holds 600, so there are plenty of seats
available.
The presenters:-
Senator Malcolm Roberts (may
have to be by prerecorded video as he expecting a grandchild)
Craig
Kelly
Professor Ian Plimer
John Ruddick
Jeff Grimshaw
Joel
Jammal (MC)
The speaker list will be finalized January
9th.
Please share
Unfortunately, being so soon on February 2nd, it does not give me enough time to complete the 2022 temperature readings updates for my Global Warming - Australia Says No - 200 Chart Study. Furthermore, I have found a new way to add another 20 charts based upon a different criteria. Hence I will need to present at a later date. For my as yet undisputed 200 Chart Study please click here
Dr David
One of Australia’s Most Accomplished Speakers on the now won issue of Global Warming as the alleged driver for Climate Change (as far as Australia goes).
Twelve Talks Given:
One was so effective that it resulted in the very recent November 2022 murder of the Open Forum convenor, Mr David Duffy, for his having hosted the recently uploaded address on the evening of June 3rd, 2020, in defiance of covid.
BrisbaneGlobalWarming190302.MP3
210211GlobalWarmingDisprovingStrategy.MP3
200603GlobalWarmingAustSaysNo.MP3 – In Memorium: The David Duffy Death Sentence Talk. David Duffy ran the Open Forum every Wednesday night in Chippendale (NSW) for over 50 years non stop till the biological warfare siege hit Sydney which elicited the 22.3.20 – 28.3.20 Corona Lien War Lien ans stopped talks for a few weeks, to his great distress . At the very beginning of the audio you can hear David customarily ringing his bell, which was to become his death knell bell as I allege he was murdered in November 2022, just gone, for having hosted this particular talk that got to be one of only a very few Open Forum talks ever put up on the internet, as I understand none of the others over the 50 years, except a few other most unusual talks that I gave (click link for some very interesting listens about things you have never heard anywhere before, not even in Nexus or New Dawn), were ever uploaded and are all lost forever. Will an inquest ever be opened? Quite possibly, I would say. Open Forum (click on link for their Meetup website) continues in his honour and you can go along to Chippendale any Wednesday night and hear fascinating speakers on a most diverse range of topics and meet some equally fascinating people and buy some interesting, divergently thinking, books with a supper, all for only $5 - Dr David, Law Therapist.
OUTSIDE DOWNING CENTRE COURT 5.5
Paragraphs 94 TO 101 Extract of Document served on the first Prosecutor, (who subsequently quit, as did the second) in an exchange service of two documents, his and mine, outside Court 5.5 of the Downing Centre at High Noon on May 30th, 2022, upon which service, thus upon his undisclosed international client, he said, suprized that I was unexpectedly cross serving a document outside the Courtroom, “Is this for me” and I said “Yes”, at law, like a lightning bolt of electric legal lightening shooting to every extremity of the clandestine illicit structure and signatured governmental, corporate and individual member, the WEF, IPCC et al, were trounced and all those associated insolvenced, under the higher standard accrual system of accounting, as the amount of all the previously theirs former moneys and assets was far less than the amount they negligently left it open to me to choose (in para 96 below, when I ‘96ed’ them, if any woman would like to celebrate to get financial et al spill-over blessings) when they went off in a huff, having responded to my Contractual Civil Bet (for which I obtained the precedent in my Supreme Court Equity matter in 2015) and so upon service: Title to all moneys and assets passed to me as the poser and winner of my above Contractual Civil Bet of April 1st 2020, thus entitling me to a UCPR s17.7 Judgment Upon Admissions, is it all not the case I ask under s17.3 of the NSW UCPR - and if not then why not?
The Taking On of the Global Warming Challenge and Birth of Reserve 16
However, it is notable, that in serving upon me the bail conditions document, the prosecution for the Commonwealth Government has arguably, quite intentionally and knowingly, responded out of contempt to my contractual civil bet to be found at paragraphs 26a-h on my aussiedebtbailout.html webpage, as concerning the Global Warming challenge, published on April 1st 2020, open to all comers. On April 26th the CDPP’s and ASIC’s totalitarian and authoritarian instructing paying principals characteristically responded by contemptuously, dismissively and impetuously (look up) demanding the entire irrefutable, flawless and impeccable Global Warming 100 charts project be taken down as they could not find fault with my site as no one could not overcome the chart evidence therein and so, implicitly, in response to the challenge, adequately enough committed to and activated my the contractual civil bet, but contemptuously, defiantly and dismissively waived any opportunity to discuss the quantum for the said wager bet, leaving it to me to pick absolutely any figure at all that I like, and unlike in my previous invited 2014 contractual civil bet of March 10th to 14th, 2014, I do not have to be able to ante up to come up with my chosen figure as I had to in 2014, so I have picked a binding figure that I like, that on May 31st, with service of this Notice upon its operative, the processicutor, binds the other side opposed to me whose authoritarian response was for me to shut down my site and offer by way of a threatening bail application alleging me to be a criminal and my study to be criminal. Hence, since I am dealing with criminals, as my study shows them to up to be, the figure that I have chosen is the sexiest figure that I could summon up so there could be maximum blessings for all on my side and all those who sincerely wish to come across and leave the side with the curse.
The figure I have decided upon for my activated Global Warming - Australia Says No, contractual civil bet ‘fortress’ study is:
$999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999.99
which is $999 sextillion, 999 quintillion, 999 quadrillion, 999 trillion, 999 billion, 999 million, 999 thousand and 999.99, which is one cent short of 1 septillion, the sexiest loving amount ever, meaning there is going to be magic.
By their contemptuously and dismissively abdicating and abandoning any right as to input into my choice of quantum as to my contractual civil bet awaiting them in my challenging irrefutable and unassailable ‘Global Warming – Australia Says No’ challenge trap, the prosecution’s totalitarian authoritarian instructing client/s, who imperiously commanded the shutting down of such sites because they cannot fault their findings, have brought instant and implicit sudden death insolvency upon themselves. Now all we have to do is go in and clarify and collect and mop up as the battle is o’er and I have implicitly won. ‘It is all over bar the shouting’ as all was done lawfully with attention to detail and all I’s dotted and t’s crossed.
The bail application proponents had no interest in entering into discussions as to quantum of the contractual civil wager do not give a toss as to what figure I come up with as they do not ever intend to pay anything – and now, under the accrual system of accounting, they are instantly, technically insolvent for pushing a mass deception which they all know to be a pack of lies, as far as Australia goes, called global warming, the alleged driver of so called, now unfounded, alleged ‘climate change’, as far as Australia goes. Australia is now out of all that unfounded and tendentious rubbish and not up for any moneys as the contemptuously decisive study proves beyond reasonable doubt if you take the time to study the 100 charts, the commentary and the temperature data.
In the 28 days since the very contemptuously decisive bringing to life activation of the lying in wait, two year old contractual civil bet wager challenge as to whether there is any evidence of global warming in Australia, upon which any future policies or law could justifiably and honesty be founded, and which all contenders have never been able to overcome, my contractual civil bet sprang to life and I instantly became the entitled owner of all the moneys and assets previously owned by all of them and much more, instantly and implicitly putting them all into implicit insolvency and penury. This activation has instantly brought Reserve 16 into existence, just as I had lawfully done with the Chinese Communist Party, its members etc who have been in technical insolvency since my having foreclosed at law on March 28th 2020, pursuant to a lawfully taken international ‘war lien’ – which brought about the approach by ASIC in response in April 2020, one month to the day (28.4.20) as an evidence to all Courts and immediately created Reserve 12 on the accrual basis of accounting.
If Reserve 16’s and the prosecutor’s client are the same then, if the taken on contractual civil bet implicitly ‘wiped’ them out as of April 26th and they are insolvent, then they will mean they are incurring debt whilst insolvent when the 128th quarterly rest 10% comes up on June 18th. And they had a chance to walk away for $1 on May 3rd and it could have been over, Reserve 16, it might be argued or may even be nil as both clients had the chance to walk away for $1 each – and Ms Pietsch’s client might have been able to get out of Reserve 12.
The Taking On of the Global Warming Challenge and Birth of Reserve 16
However, it is notable, that in serving upon me the bail conditions document, the prosecution for the Commonwealth Government has arguably, quite intentionally and knowingly, responded out of contempt to my contractual civil bet to be found at paragraphs 26 a-h on my aussiedebtbailout.html webpage, as concerning the Global Warming challenge, published on April 1st 2020, open to all comers. On April 26th the CDPP’s and ASIC’s totalitarian and authoritarian instructing paying principals characteristically responded by contemptuously, dismissively and impetuously (look up) demanding the entire irrefutable, flawless and impeccable Global Warming 200 charts project be taken down as they could not find fault with my site as no one could not overcome the chart evidence therein and so, implicitly, in response to the challenge, adequately enough committed to and activated my the contractual civil bet, but contemptuously, defiantly and dismissively waived any opportunity to discuss the quantum for the said wager bet, leaving it to me to pick absolutely any figure at all that I like, and unlike in my previous invited 2014 contractual civil bet of March 10th to 14th, 2014, I do not have to be able to ante up to come up with my chosen figure as I had to in 2014, so I have picked a binding figure that I like, that on May 31st, with service of this Notice upon its operative, the processicutor, binds the other side opposed to me whose authoritarian response was for me to shut down my site and offer by way of a threatening bail application alleging me to be a criminal and my study to be criminal. Hence, since I am dealing with criminals, as my study shows them to up to be, the figure that I have chosen is the sexiest figure that I could summon up so there could be maximum blessings for all on my side and all those who sincerely wish to come across and leave the side with the curse.
The figure I have decided upon for my activated Global Warming - Australia Says No, contractual civil bet ‘fortress’ study is:
$999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999.99
which is $999 sextillion, 999 quintillion, 999 quadrillion, 999 trillion, 999 billion, 999 million, 999 thousand and 999.99, which is one cent short of 1 septillion, the sexiest loving amount ever, meaning there is going to be magic.
By their contemptuously and dismissively abdicating and abandoning any right as to input into my choice of quantum as to my contractual civil bet awaiting them in my challenging irrefutable and unassailable ‘Global Warming – Australia Says No’ challenge trap, the prosecution’s totalitarian authoritarian instructing client/s, who imperiously commanded the shutting down of such sites because they cannot fault their findings, have brought instant and implicit sudden death insolvency upon themselves. Now all we have to do is go in and clarify and collect and mop up as the battle is o’er and I have implicitly won. ‘It is all over bar the shouting’ as all was done lawfully with attention to detail and all I’s dotted and t’s crossed.
The bail application proponents had no interest in entering into discussions as to quantum of the contractual civil wager do not give a toss as to what figure I come up with as they do not ever intend to pay anything – and now, under the accrual system of accounting, they are instantly, technically insolvent for pushing a mass deception which they all know to be a pack of lies, as far as Australia goes, called global warming, the alleged driver of so called, now unfounded, alleged ‘climate change’, as far as Australia goes. Australia is now out of all that unfounded and tendentious rubbish and not up for any moneys as the contemptuously decisive study proves beyond reasonable doubt if you take the time to study the 200 charts, the commentary and the temperature data.
In the 28 days since the very contemptuously decisive bringing to life activation of the lying in wait, two year old contractual civil bet wager challenge as to whether there is any evidence of global warming in Australia, upon which any future policies or law could justifiably and honesty be founded, and which all contenders have never been able to overcome, my contractual civil bet sprang to life and I instantly became the entitled owner of all the moneys and assets previously owned by all of them and much more, instantly and implicitly putting them all into implicit insolvency and penury. This activation has instantly brought Reserve 16 into existence, just as I had lawfully done with the Chinese Communist Party, its members etc who have been in technical insolvency since my having foreclosed at law on March 28th 2020, pursuant to a lawfully taken international ‘war lien’ – which brought about the approach by ASIC in response in April 2020, one month to the day (28.4.20) as an evidence to all Courts and immediately created Reserve 12 on the accrual basis of accounting.
If Reserve 16’s and the prosecutor’s client are the same then, if the taken on contractual civil bet implicitly ‘wiped’ them out as of April 26thand they are insolvent, then they will mean they are incurring debt whilst insolvent when the 128th quarterly rest 10% comes up on June 18th. And they had a chance to walk away for $1 on May 3rd and it could have been over, Reserve 16, it might be argued or may even be nil as both clients had the chance to walk away for $1 each – and Ms Pietsch’s client might have been able to get out of Reserve 12.
Notice to admit facts
(1) The requesting party may, by a notice served on the admitting party ("the requesting party's notice" ), require the admitting party to admit, for the purposes of the proceedings only, the facts specified in the notice.
(2) If, as to any fact specified in the requesting party's notice, the admitting party does not, within 14 days after service on the admitting party of the requesting party's notice, serve on the requesting party a notice disputing that fact, that fact is, for the purposes of the proceedings only, taken to have been admitted by the admitting party in favour of the requesting party only.
(3) The admitting party may, with the leave of the court, withdraw any such admission.
Judgment on admissions
(1) If admissions are made by a party, whether by his or her pleadings or otherwise, the court may, on the application of any other party, give any judgment or make any order to which the other party is entitled on the admissions.
(2) The court may exercise its powers under this rule even if the other questions in the proceedings have not been determined.
